Standing out when everyone has the same tools

Pop quiz: Which AI startup has the purple gradient and the sparkle icon?

Trick question. They all do.

When AI tools went mainstream, an entire industry converged on identical visual language. Magic wands. Sparkles. Purple-to-blue gradients. The same icons, the same colors, the same vibe, thousands of companies all trying to communicate "intelligent and innovative," all ending up indistinguishable.

This is what happens when everyone has access to the same tools and nobody does the real work to be different.

The convergence problem

AI design tools are trained on what exists. Every successful landing page. Every polished SaaS interface. Every design trend that worked well enough to make it into the training data.

When you prompt for design, you get the average of all of that. The statistical middle. The safe choice. The thing most likely to be "correct" based on everything that came before.

This is great for speed. It's terrible for standing out.

Because the average is, by definition, what everyone else is doing. Similar layouts. Similar components. Similar illustration styles. Similar everything.

You see it in UI design constantly now. Products that could swap interfaces and nobody would notice. Landing pages that feel like variations on a single template. An entire market of professional, polished, forgettable sameness.

AI didn't cause this problem, design trends have always existed. But AI is accelerating it. Making it easier than ever to produce average at scale.

“

When you prompt for design, you get the average of all of it. This is great for speed. It's terrible for standing out.

The cost of blending in

Here's what's actually at stake.

Users don't choose products in isolation. They research. They compare. They visit your site and your competitor's site in the same afternoon. They sign up for two free trials and forget which is which.

If you look like everyone else, you're a blur. Interchangeable. "One of those tools that does X." When they see your ad a week later, nothing registers, you didn't make enough of an impression to remember.

If you look different - genuinely, intentionally different - you cut through. You're "the one with the unusual aesthetic." The one that felt different. The one they can actually recall when it's time to buy.

This isn't fluffy brand theory. This is recognition, recall, and conversion. Being memorable is a competitive advantage. Being forgettable is death by a thousand comparisons.

What different actually looks like

Let me show you two brands that pass what I call the "cover your logo test."

Churnkey took a completely different approach. They built their entire visual identity around mid-century, Bauhaus-inspired abstract shapes. Not as decoration, as foundation. It informs their color palette, textures, patterns, and even how their product UI looks. The result is a SaaS product that looks like nothing else in the category. It's instantly recognizable. And because it's rooted in a timeless design movement rather than a current trend, it won't feel dated when the next UI fad arrives.

Every.to operates in a space where looking generic would be easy - newsletters, writing tools, AI. But you know you're on an Every article before you see their logo. The visual style, the typography, the way they write and frame ideas - It's all coherent, all distinctive, all traceable to a central brand idea. That didn't happen by accident. It happened through intentional systems thinking about who they are and how to express it.

Both of these brands use AI tools. But they use AI to execute a vision, not to generate one.

Differentiation isn't decoration

Here's the mistake: thinking differentiation is about surface-level changes.

Pick unusual colors. Find a quirky illustration style. Add some personality to the headlines. Quick wins, easily executed, feels like progress.

But that's cosmetic differentiation. It doesn't hold up because it's not rooted in anything.

Real differentiation is systemic. It starts with strategic clarity: Who are you? What problem are you solving that others aren't? What do you believe that your competitors don't?

Then it becomes a system - visual style, verbal style, product experience, customer interaction - where every element reinforces every other element. Where the whole is coherent and distinctive, not just the parts.

AI can't build that system. It can generate components, but it can't ensure coherence. It can't decide that Bauhaus shapes are the right metaphor for your brand. It can't make the strategic choice to write with a particular voice because that's who you are.

That's the invisible work. The craft. The 90% that determines whether you have a brand or just a collection of AI-generated assets.

“

AI can generate components, but it can't ensure coherence. That's the invisible work. The craft.

The systems thinking advantage

Here's what gives brands like Every.to and Churnkey their staying power: they're built on systems, not trends.

A trend-based brand looks great today and dated tomorrow. You're constantly chasing the next aesthetic, because your identity is borrowed from whatever's currently popular.

A systems-based brand has its own internal logic. It evolves, but it evolves consistently with its core identity. It can absorb new design tools, new trends, new market conditions without losing what makes it distinctive.

This requires thinking beyond individual assets. How does our visual style express our values? How does our writing voice connect to our product experience? What makes us coherent across every touchpoint?

AI accelerates asset production. But it can't do the systems thinking that makes those assets add up to something memorable.

Standing for something

The brands that survive the AI commoditization wave will be the ones that stand for something specific.

Not "we're innovative" (everyone says that). Not "we're user-friendly" (table stakes). Something real. Something that comes from genuine clarity about who you are and who you're for.

That clarity is the foundation of differentiation. Without it, you're just pushing pixels around, making cosmetic changes that don't add up to a distinctive brand.

With it, AI becomes incredibly powerful. You can execute your vision faster, iterate more quickly, explore more options. But you're executing your vision, not accepting AI's default.

“

The tools are the same for everyone now. The thinking is what sets you apart.

The question your brand needs to answer

Your competitors have the same AI tools you do. They can generate professional designs in minutes. So can everyone else in your market.

So the question isn't how to design faster.

The question is: What makes you worth remembering?

If you can answer that clearly - if you really know who you are and what you stand for - then AI is a force multiplier. You can express your distinctiveness at a scale and speed that wasn't possible before.

If you can't answer it, AI will just help you blend in faster.

One path leads to brand equity. The other leads to another sparkle icon in a sea of sparkle icons.

The tools are the same for everyone now. The thinking is what sets you apart.